Back
RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Sonamati, W/o. Shri Dadan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Rajpur, Dist. Surguaj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Both these appeals are arising out of the common incident and common judgment, therefore, they are being decided together.
2. CRA No. 353/2003 has been filed by appellants Dadan Yadav and Smt. Jamunibai and CRA No.352/2003 has been filed by appellant Smt. Sonamati against the common judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11-03-2003 which has been passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Ambikapur Surguja in Sessions Case No.338/2002 (State of C.G. Vs. Dadan Ram and Smt. Jamuni Bai) and Sessions Case No.339/2002 (State of C.G. Vs. Smt. Sonamati) whereby each of these appellants have been convicted and sentenced as mentioned below with a direction to run all the jail sentences councurrenlty -
| Conviction | Sentence |
| U/s 498-A of the IPC | R.I. for 3 years and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine further R.I. for 6 months |
| U/s 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC | R.I. for 10 years and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine further R.I. for 6 months |
3. Brief facts of the case are that deceased Ratnari Bai was married with accused/appellant Dadan Ram Yadav since 10 years back from the date of incident. She committed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
