GOUTAM BHADURI, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL
Siyaram Sirdar S/o Madhau Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard.
1. This criminal appeal preferred by the appellant under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is directed against the impugned judgment dated 05/11/2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District Surajpur, C.G. in Sessions Trial No.66/2018 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 449 & 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 Years & Life Imprisonment, respectively and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- for each offence and in default of payment of fine amount further R.I. for 2 months for each offence was ordered.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that Dhirsai (PW-1) made a report on 22/06/2018 at Police Station Premnagar that his mother-in-law Rameshwari Kotari went to field to work and while she was taking rest he went there to provide food wherein he saw that the appellant has assaulted his mother-in-law Rameshwari Kotari by an axe on his head in a hutment and thereafter after closing the hutment he was running away. When he went inside the hutment he saw that his mother-in-law was unconscious and injured. Having asked, she could not narrate anything subsequently she succumbed to such injuries. The motive was attributed tha
Dandu Lakshmi Reddy v. State of A.P.
P. Sanjeeva Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh {(2012) 7 SCC 56}
State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Chaganlal Raghani {(2001) 9 SCC 1}
State of Rajasthan v.Ani @ Hanif and Ors. (1997) 6 SCC 162
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. [AIR 1959 SC 1012 : 1959 Cri LJ 1231]
V.K. Mishra and another v. State of Uttarakhand and another {AIR 2015 SC 3043}
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.