Back
RAMESH SINHA, RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Vikas Jain S/o Late Santosh Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through SHO, Pulgaon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeals are being consolidated due to arising from the same crime number and sessions trial. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court's findings focus on the insufficient circumstantial evidence to affirm guilt. (Para 8 , 12 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. the court reiterates the importance of proof beyond reasonable doubt in circumstantial cases. (Para 10 , 11 , 71 , 76 , 89) |
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
1. All the above Three Cases i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 717 of 2021, Criminal Misc. Petition No. 816 of 2021 and Acquittal Appeal No. 224 of 2021 are arising out of same Crime Number and Same Sessions Trial and therefore they are being decided together. The Criminal Appeal No. 717 of 2021 is against conviction of accused Vikas Jain and Ajit Singh. The Criminal Misc. Petition No. 816 of 2021 and Acquittal Appeal No. 224 of 2021 both are against acquittal of co- accused Kimshi Kamboj (Jain).
2. Criminal Appeal No.717 of 2021 arises out of the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 10/05/2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Durg, in Sessions Case No. 71/2016 whereby appellants Vikas Jain and Ajit Singh have been convicted for offences under Sections 302 read with Section 34 , 12
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
