Back
RAMESH SINHA, RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Dilip Sariwan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.—Since the aforesaid six criminal appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 14.12.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pendra Road in Sessions Trial No.10/2020, they were clubbed & heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Appellants-Dilip Sariwan (A1), Mahendra @ Girdhari Panika (A2), Jai Prakash Yadav (A3), Tirath Lal Kashipuri (A4), Pawan Singh Marco (A5), Smt. Kamta Panika (A6) and Ritesh Verma @ Kaleji (A7) have preferred these six criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 14.12.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pendra Road in Sessions Trial No.10/2020, by which the learned trial Court has convicted appellants-Tirath Lal, Dilip Sariwan @ Sunny, Pawan Marco, Jai Prakash Yadav @ Monu and Ritesh Verma @ Kaleji for offence under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for six months and RI for five years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for three months. The trial Court has also c
(1) Circumstantial evidence – It is necessary for prosecution that circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should be fully established. Suspicion, however strong it may be, cannot....
The court affirmed that circumstantial evidence, when established beyond reasonable doubt, can support convictions for murder and conspiracy, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence....
The conviction of the appellants for murder and conspiracy was upheld based on circumstantial evidence, establishing a common intention to kill for financial gain through witchcraft.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, every link in the evidence chain must be fully established, with a complete narrative supporting the conclusion of guilt; mere suspicion is insuffi....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that excludes any reasonable doubt of the accused's innocence.
Convictions based on circumstantial evidence must establish a reliable chain linking the accused to the crime beyond reasonable doubt.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must provide a complete and unbroken chain of evidence that conclusively points to the guilt of the accused, failing which the accu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
