RAMESH SINHA, PARTH PRATEEM SAHU
Registrar General High Court of Chhattisgarh – Appellant
Versus
Fanendra Kumar Bisen S/o Late Soman Lal Bisen – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1.Heard Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/ respondent nos. 2 & 3.
2.This writ appeal is presented by the appellant assailing the order dated 15.06.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No. 3617 of 2019, whereby the learned Single Judge has partly allowed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner / respondent No.1 herein.
3.Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Grade-III vide order dated 24.01.1992. The wife of the petitioner had undergone family planning operation (Tubectomy) on 29.07.1999. On account of the family planning operation the benefit of two advance increments has been granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.08.1999. The petitioner got the above benefit till December, 2004. Subsequently vide order dated 19.01.2005, the petitioner promoted to the post of Assistant Grade-II in the pay scale of Rs. 4000-100-6000, but the benefit of advance increment was not extended to the petitione
State of M.P. and others Vs. R..K. Chaturvedi and another
Dr.Smt. Vijiya Kothalkar, Ujjain Vs. State of M.P. and three ors.
An employee cannot claim further advance increments after promotion, as these increments are included in the basic pay upon promotion.
Advance increments to stenographers for shorthand speed are 'pay for all purposes', including annual increments, till promotion/ACP/MACP; department's exclusion for increment calculation unjustified ....
An employee is entitled to an increment if their juniors receive a lower pay, provided no undue advantage in promotion or pay scale is claimed.
Judicial ruling affirms equal pay adjustment rights for senior employees despite increment anomalies resulting from different departmental exam timings.
An employee need not wait for twelve months from the fixation of his/her pay in the new scale for earning in the revised scale.
Point of Law : powers of Government of India, of Local Governments and of subordinate authorities to grant a premature increment to an officer are subject to limits up to which each such authority ca....
Recovery of authorized increments from pension is impermissible without due process; prior court rulings must be respected.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.