SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 249

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Jainal Uddin Laskar S/o Late Khair Uddin Laskar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:MR S BORTHAKUR, MS. P BORAH Advocate
For the Respondent: GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C. K. S. Baruah, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents.

2. The challenge in the present proceeding is to an Gratuity Payment Order (GPO) dated 08.07.2021, issued by the Office of the Principal Accountant General (A & E) Assam, wherein, recovery of Rs. 3,15,350/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Fifteen thousand Three hundred Fifty) was directed from the Death Cum Retirement Gratuity (DCRG) so authorized to the petitioner towards the over payment of pay and allowances to him during his service tenure.

3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding is noticed as under:-

The petitioner herein was recruited as a Constable in the Assam Police in the year 1982. The petitioner, at the time of his initial recruitment was a matriculate. The petitioner, thereafter, completed his Higher Secondary Examination in the year 1984. On acquiring the Higher Secondary qualification, the petitioner, w.e.f. 09.10.1985, was granted two advance increments for the Higher Secondary qualification s


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top