Back
NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Lalita Verma, W/o. Rajnish Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Department Of General Administration – Respondent
ORDER :
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.)
1. By filing WPC No.1944/2019, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.02.2019 passed by High Leval Caste Scrutiny Committee, whereby the said Committee has cancelled the caste certificate of the petitioner, whereas by filing WPS No.4973/2019, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.05.2019 passed by Divisional Joint Director Agriculture, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (CG), whereby services of the petitioner has been terminated on the basis of order dated 23.02.2019 passed by High Leval Caste Scrutiny Committee. Hence, it is very much relevant to hear both the cases analogously, therefore, both the cases are heard and decided by a common order.
2. The petitioner has preferred WPC No. 1944/2019 under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief:-
10.ii That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the show cause notice dated 07.05.2019.
10.iii Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner.
10.iv. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deem
The court ruled that the cancellation of the caste certificate was unjustified, reinstating the petitioner's service based on her established caste identity and residency prior to state reorganizatio....
The verification of validity of caste certificate and determination of caste status should be done only by the Caste Scrutiny Committee constituted in accordance with the law.
The insistence on pre-1950 records for caste verification is contrary to established legal principles, particularly the Supreme Court's guidelines.
The judgment underscores the significance of prompt scrutiny of caste certificates and the impact of false certificates on genuine candidates, emphasizing the need for swift resolution of caste-relat....
Migrating from one state does not grant automatic Scheduled Caste benefits in another state, despite similar caste nomenclature.
Denial of Scheduled Caste status based on caste certificate format is unconstitutional under Article 14, violating rights protected by Section 73 of the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000.
A fraudulent document is non est from the beginning and cannot be countenanced in law. A party to a litigation cannot approbate and reprobate from his stand taken before a quasi-judicial authority to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
