SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 175

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Lal Bahadur Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Order :

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.)

1. Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner.Also heard Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 and 2 as well as Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the acts of respondent authorities, by which they have not released the retiral dues of the petitioner i.e. Pension, Gratuity, G.P.F., Leave encashment, Family Benefit Scheme/GIS etc.

3. By filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-

“10.1 This Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents authority to immediately release the all the retiral dues ie. Pension, Gratuity, G.P.F., GIS, Leave encashment, etc to the petitioner which he is legally entitled on date of his superannuation and also quash the order of withholding of retiral dues of the petitioner, if any, passed by the respondent authority.

10.2 Further hold that the petitioner is entitles for the interest on the retiral dues from the date it fell due till realization at the rate of 18% per anmum.

10.3 Any other relief as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court.”

4. Brief facts of the case, are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top