Hans Kumar Rajwade S/o Shri Balrup Ram Rajwade vs State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Chh) 114

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Hans Kumar Rajwade S/o Shri Balrup Ram Rajwade – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate

Table of Content
1. challenge of contractual appointment status. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioners argue for regularization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. state argues against regularization. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's detailed examination of procedures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. supreme court precedents on regularization. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. court supports regularization due to continuous service. (Para 22)
7. final directive for regularization and benefits. (Para 23 , 24)

ORDER :

Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.

1. By filing the present petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 25.10.2022 (Annexure P/1), whereby it has been held that the petitioners’ appointments would not be treated as regular appointments and would continue to remain contractual in nature. The petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“10.1 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and quash the impugned order dated 25.10.2022 (Annexure P/1) thereby saying that the petitioners' appointment would not be altered as a regular appointment and would remain contractual in nature, in a most arbitrary manner.

10.2 Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus and di