SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Chh) 141

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 
AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD, J. 
Vishwakarma Patel, S/o. Jai Prakash Patel - Appellants 
Versus 
Fuleshwar Rao, S/o. Thakur Ram Respondents 
MAC No. 1879 of 2018 
Decided On : 02-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pravesh Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate

Court emphasized the need for compensation to reflect permanent disability and loss of earning capacity, enhancing the award to ensure justice.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Appeal against award - Claimant seeking enhancement of compensation due to significant injuries suffered in a vehicular accident. The Tribunal initially awarded Rs.16,50,209/- for injuries and expenses. Court found inadequate compensation given the 100% permanent functional disability suffered by the appellant, including leg amputation; total compensation increased to Rs.32,74,009/- considering loss of earning capacity and future prospects. (Paras 1-15)

(B) Injury Claims - Appellants must demonstrate the inadequacy of the compensation awarded to be considered for enhancement; established principles on assessing permanent disability must be adhered to. (Paras 6-7)

(C) Duty of the Court - Courts must ensure just and reasonable compensation reflects the financial loss incurred due to disability, life-long impact of injuries, and employment capacity affected by physical impairment. (Paras 9, 12, 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
Claimant sustained grievous injuries, leading to amputation below the knee, was employed as a driver and required substantial medical treatment following an accident on 31.10.2016 involving a collision with a bus.

Findings of Court:
Compensation assessed and increased reflecting the claimant’s disability and loss of earning capacity, with an emphasis on future prospects in employment.

Issues: Whether the compensation awarded was adequate considering the nature and extent of injuries, and if permanent disability was correctly quantified.

Ratio Decidendi: Court ruled that the Tribunal's award was insufficient given the circumstances of the case, emphasizing the need to account for permanent functional disability and loss of earning capacity.

Result: Appeal allowed in part; claimant entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.16,23,800/- plus interest.

Table of Content
1. details of the appeal and initial award (Para 1 , 2)
2. circumstances of the accident and injuries (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments for enhancement of compensation (Para 6 , 7)
4. court analysis of disability and compensation adequacy (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. calculation of adjusted compensation (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. final decision and enhanced compensation awarded (Para 14 , 15)

Order :

Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the Act”) against the award dated 8.8.2018 passed by the Fifth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) in Claim Case No.795/2016.

2. By the impugned award, the Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimant under Section 166 of the Act and awarded a total sum of Rs.16,50,209/- by way of compensation to the claimant for the injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident.

3. So the question that arises for consideration in this appeal filed by the claimant (appellant) is whether any case for enhancement is made out in the award of compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the claimant and if so, to what extent?

4. It is an injury case. On 31.10.2016, the appellant was driving a truck bearing registration No.CG-7-A-V-7377 from Bhilai transporting a consignment of vegetables. At about 1:00 p.m., while travelling on Katghora-Ambikapur road, near Gram Chotiya, a bus bearing registration No.CG-15-A B-9693, driven rashly and negligently by respondent No.1 collided head-on with the front of the appellant’s truck. The impact completely smashed the front portion of the truck, causing the vehicle to veer off the road and fall into a ditch. The appellant and the vehicle cleaner sustained grievous injuries. The injured parties were taken to Podi Government Hospital and subsequently to the Government Hospital, Korba. Owing to the critical condition of the claimant, he was referred to CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur for advanced treatment. Subsequently, he was admitted in Suyash Hospital, Raipur for specialized treatment. As a result of the accident, the claimant’s left leg was amputated below knee. He also sustained a fracture in his right leg (below knee), which required surgery and internal fixation (plates and screws). He suffered multiple external and internal injuries throughout the body. It was stated that at the time of the accident, the claimant was employed as a driver earning a monthly salary of Rs.8000/- plus a daily allowance of Rs.100/-. The information with regard to the accident was given to Police Station Bango, District Korba, on the basis of which, an offence was registered against respondent No.1.

5. The non-applicants contested the claim. Parties adduced evidence. The Tribunal as stated supra, allowed the claim petition in part. The Tribunal awarded Rs.2,54,079/- towards medicines, Rs.1,24,530/- towards medical expenses and Rs.50,000/- towards future medical treatment. Additionally, Rs.1,00,000/- was awarded towards pain and suffering (mental agony) and Rs.20,000/- towards Special Diet. In this way, a total sum of Rs.16,50,209/- was awarded to the claimant by way of compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident. The appellant/claimant has preferred this appeal challenging the said determination on the ground that the compensation is inadequate and on the lower side, seeking enhancement of the award.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as a result of the accident, the appellant, who was employed as a professional driver, has suffered 100% permanent functional disability. He submits that the Tribunal failed to appreciate the gravity of this loss in its true perspective. He also submits that in the said accident, the appellant’s left leg was amputated below the knee and he sustained a severe fracture in his right leg which required internal fixation with plates and screws. Furthermore, the right leg required Ilizarov fixation and due

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top