RAJANI DUBEY, AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Manish Bajpai – Appellant
Versus
Alkesh Lakde, S/o Shri Duttatrey Lakde – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajani Dubey, J.
1.The appellant/Defendant has preferred this first appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 13.02.2019 passed by IX Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.), in Civil Suit No.173-A/2011, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein for specific performance of contract was allowed.
2.Brief facts of the case, as per the plaint averments, are that the defendant is owner and in possession of land admeasuring 980 sq.ft. of Khasra No.156/25 situated at Mouza Juna Bilaspur, P.H. No.22, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, Ward No.32, Ramdas Nagar, Tagore Chowk, Tikrapara, on which a house is built on ground floor and first floor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit land’). The defendant agreed to sell the suit land to plaintiff for total sale consideration of Rs.11,00,000/- and request was made by the plaintiff to reduce in writing the agreement, however, the defendant told the plaintiff that the suit land is not recorded in his name, mutation is to be done and after purchasing the suit land the defendant has not got transferred his name. Thereafter, on 22.12.2007, an agreement was executed and earnest money of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid to def
Kamal Kumar Vs. Premlata Joshi & Ors. (2019) 3 SCC 704
Katta Sujatha Reddy & Anr. Vs. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Private Limited and Ors. (2023) 1 SCC 355
Laxman Tatyaba Kankate & Anr. Vs. Taramati Harischandra Dhatrak (2010) 7 SCC 717
Moumita Poddar Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr. (2010) 9 SCC 291
Nedunuri Kameshwaramma Vs. Sampati Subba Rao AIR 1963 SC 884
P. Daivasigamani Vs. S. Sambandan (2022) 14 SCC 793
Parminder Singh Vs. Gurpreet Singh (2018) 13 SCC 352
Savitri Pandey Vs. Prem Chandra Pandey (2002) 2 SCC 73
The appellate court emphasized that specific performance requires proof of the plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract, which was not adequately addressed by the trial Court.
The plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations for specific performance; failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract negates entitlement to specific performance under Specific Relief Act.
A plaintiff in a specific performance suit must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations throughout, as mandated by Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act....
In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, which was not established in this case.
To secure a decree for specific performance, plaintiffs must demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness, supported by credible evidence, amidst a contract that specifies actionable terms.
Plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract for specific performance; mere assertion is insufficient.
Agreement to Sell – In a suit for specific performance of agreement, it is for Plaintiff to prove his readiness and willingness to perform his obligations under the agreement – Where a certain amount....
Party praying for specific performance of a contract has to prove on record availability of balance sale consideration on date when it was required to be paid.
Specific performance requires proof of continuous readiness and willingness by the plaintiff, and failure to demonstrate this justifies denial of relief.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.