SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 282

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.
Subhash Chandra Chouhan S/o Shri Lakhan Lal Chouhan - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya - Respondent
WPS No. 5997 of 2023, WPS No. 2227 of 2024, WPS No. 5999 of 2023, WPS No. 6001 of 2023, WPS No. 6003 of 2023, WPS No. 6004 of 2023, WPS No. 6005 of 2023, WPS No. 6018 of 2023, WPS No. 6026 of 2023, WPS No. 6029 of 2023, WPS No. 6430 of 2023, WPS No. 6431 of 2023, WPS No. 6436 of 2023, WPS No. 6439 of 2023, WPS No. 6693 of 2023, WPS No. 6738 of 2023, WPS No. 7008 of 2023, WPS No. 7051 of 2023, WPS No. 7061 of 2023, WPS No. 7084 of 2023, WPS No. 7090 of 2023, WPS No. 7094 of 2023, WPS No. 7105 of 2023, WPS No. 7116 of 2023, WPS No. 7185 of 2023, WPS No. 7198 of 2023, WPS No. 7337 of 2023, WPS No. 7359 of 2023, WPS No. 7361 of 2023, WPS No. 7362 of 2023, WPS No. 7371 of 2023, WPS No. 7372 of 2023, WPS No. 7373 of 2023, WPS No. 7394 of 2023, WPS No. 7405 of 2023, WPS No. 7437 of 2023, WPS No. 7439 of 2023, WPS No. 7440 of 2023, WPS No. 7443 of 2023, WPS No. 8379 of 2023, WPS No. 8381 of 2023, WPS No. 8382 of 2023, WPS No. 8384 of 2023, WPS No. 8386 of 2023, WPS No. 8391 of 2023, WPS No. 8399 of 2023, WPS No. 8411 of 2023, WPS No. 8615 of 2023, WPS No. 8618 of 2023, WPS No. 8620 of 2023, WPS No. 8634 of 2023, WPS No. 8640 of 2023, WPS No. 8644 of 2023, WPS No. 8647 of 2023, WPS No. 8648 of 2023, WPS No. 8649 of 2023, WPS No. 8653 of 2023, WPS No. 8654 of 2023, WPS No. 8656 of 2023, WPS No. 8659 of 2023, WPS No. 8667 of 2023
Decided On : 17-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate, Ms. Akanksha Jain, Advocate

Circulars related to pay scales and arrears apply prospectively, and past service benefits are not transferable post-departure from the department.

Headnote:(A) Chhattisgarh Non-Gazetted Class-III School Education (School Level Services) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008 - Circulars dated 01.05.2012, 17.05.2013, and 24.04.2023 - Petitioners claim entitlement to time-scale, revised pay-scale, and arrears as Headmasters based on past service as Shiksha Karmis - Court clarifies that benefits under the circulars apply only to employees serving in the Panchayat Department at the time of issuance, thus not applicable to petitioners who have since left the department - Past service will not be counted for financial benefits post-departure from the Panchayat cadre, reflecting the prospective application of benefits. (Paras 4, 12, 29, 30)

(B) Administrative Law - Judicial Review of Administrative Inaction - Failure of state to decide the pending applications of petitioners deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, yet petitioners cannot claim the benefits based on regulations not applicable to their current employment status. (Paras 12, 29)

(C) Constitutional Law - Articles 14 and 16 - Claims of discrimination and denial of equal treatment in administrative action against the backdrop of previous case law rejected as petitioners ceased to be employees of the relevant department by the time of regulation issuance. (Paras 12, 18, 30)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were appointed as Headmasters after working as Shiksha Karmis; they applied for time-scale and revised pay due to their prior service - Their applications went unanswered, prompting the writ petitions.

Findings of Court:
The court held that it has no jurisdiction to grant financial benefits based on past service, as the regulations apply only prospectively to employees still within the Panchayat system.

Issues: Whether the petitioners retain the right to benefits under previous circulars after leaving the Panchayat service; whether their application for pay-scale adjustments and arrears constitutes a legitimate expectation.

Ratio Decidendi: The circulars do not apply retrospectively to those no longer employed in the Panchayat cadre; therefore, their claims to benefits are denied, leading to the dismissal of all petitions.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek claim for past service benefits (Para 4 , 9)
2. background on petitioners' past employment (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments for counting past service for benefits (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. state's argument against petitioners' claims (Para 15 , 18 , 19)
5. legal interpretation of circulars' application (Para 23 , 29)
6. final decision dismissing the writ petitions (Para 30 , 31)

ORDER :

Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.

1. Heard Ms. Deepali Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State/respondents No.1 to 3 as well as Ms. Akanksha Jain, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4.

2. In all the writ petitions, a seminal question for adjudication has been raised. Accordingly, all the writ petitions were clubbed together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common order.

3. For the sake of convenience, WPS No. 5997 of 2023 is treated as the lead case, and for the purpose of adjudication of all the matters, the pleadings filed in WPS No. 5997 of 2023, as well as the return filed by the respondents have been taken into consideration.

4. In WPS No.5997/2023, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased direct respondent state authority no.4 to decide the pending application dated 26/6/23 of the petitioner.

10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant the arrears of Rs.6,27,280/- which the petitioner is entitled as per the circulars of the State Government.

10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the present facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted.”

5. Brief facts of the case for deciding all the writ petitions, in a nutshell, are that all the petitioners are Headmasters posted in different Government Primary Schools in the newly formed District Sarangarh–Bilaigarh. The petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmis Grade-III under the Panchayat Department during the years 1998–1999. Thereafter, they participated in the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination conducted in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Non-Gazetted Class-III School Education (School Level Services) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008, and were selected and appointed as Headmasters under the School Education Department on 25.11.2010. Upon such selection, the petitioners were duly relieved from the Panchayat cadre and since then have been continuously working as Headmasters in Primary Schools under the School Education Department.

6. The Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Government of Chhattisgarh, issued a circular dated 01.05.2012 granting the first time-scale to Assistant Teachers (Panchayat), Teachers (Panchayat), and Lecturers (Panchayat) who were graduates and had completed seven years of service, along with dearness allowance at the rate of 50% of basic pay. Subsequently, another circular dated 17.05.2013 was issued granting revised pay-scale to Teachers (Panchayat) who had completed eight years of service as on 01.05.2013, to be calculated from the date of initial appointment. Thereafter, the State Government issued a further circular dated 24.04.2023 granting arrears of pay-scale to Shiksha Karmis.

7. In pursuance of the aforesaid circulars, the petitioners submitted applications before the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad/Jila Panchayat, Baramkela, District Sarangarh–Bilaigarh, seeking grant of arrears towards the first time-scale on completion of seven years and revised pay-scale on completion of eight years of service for the period during which they had worked as Shiksha Karmis under the Panchayat Department, i.e., between the years 2005 and 2010. In WPS No. 5997 of 2023, the petitioner quantified the claim to the tune of Rs.6,27,280/-. However, despite submission of the applications along with calculation charts, the same have neither been decided nor have the arrears be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top