Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, BIBHU DATTA GURU
Om Prakash Sharma, S/o. Late Nemi Chand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of petition regarding non-promotion. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for the need of promotional avenues. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. petitioners' arguments on constitutional rights. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's analysis on creation of posts. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's finding on amendment claim denial. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 6. clarification on financial progression vs. promotion. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. final judgment to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 30) |
Order :
Ramesh Sinha , CJ.
1. Heard Mr. Somkant Verma and Mr. Rishi Kant Mahobia, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent No. 1 & 2/State and Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 3/UGC.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers :
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issues necessary Direction/ Writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities to amend the M.P. Class III Service Recruitment and Promotion (Mahavidhyala Shakha) Rules 1974 and to create promotional avenues for the post of Laboratory Technicians within
The court ruled that the state was not legally obligated to create promotional avenues for Laboratory Technicians under the existing service rules.
No vested right to promotion under old recruitment rules when new rules apply; consideration governed by rules in force on promotion date, absent mandate for pre-amendment vacancies.
Promotion rights based on seniority prior to rule changes upheld; non-consideration of eligible employees violates legal rights.
Recruitment - plea raised by the petitioners is fallacious - As mere acquiring of qualification at a relevant point of time cannot give rise to an expectation, much less, legitimate expectation of ap....
The amendment affecting chances of promotion for employees does not necessarily constitute a change in the conditions of service, and the State has the power to unilaterally amend service rules.
Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion is a valid exercise of administrative authority that does not violate constitutional equality protections. Financial career progressio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
