SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 307

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Abha Namdeo – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manoj Pranjpe, Senior Advocate alongwith Ms. Apoorva Ghore , Mr. Paraga Kotecha, Mr. Mateen Siddiqui with Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Mr. Anjay Mishra, Mr. Govind Dewangan, Mr. Rupendra Dewangan, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh Chauhan, Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Mr. Manish Kumar Sahu on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava alongwith Ms. Astha Patel, Mr. Rajendra Patel, Mr. Khilendra Sahu, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Mr. Vivek Sahu & Ms. Sharda Prasad alongwith Mr. Rahul Mishra, Mr. Nikhil Wadhwani, Mr. Ishan Verma, Mr. Anmol Sharma, Ms. Ankita Shukla, Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Nelson Panna with Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Ms. Shalini Kashyap, Ms. Rameshwari Kumari, Mr. Rudra Pratap Dubey, Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Mr. Mukesh Kauhsik with Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Ms. Subha Shrivastava, Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Mr. Siddharth Pandey with Mr. Ujjawal Agrawal, Mr. R.K. Verma with Mr. Dilesh Kumar Kuree, Mr. Palash Agrawal, Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Mr. Deepak Kaushik, Mr. Dinesh Yadav, Mr. Shiv Sewak Manjhi, Ms. Shraddha Mishra, Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Mr. Sameer Behar, Mr. Nishchay Thakur, Mr. Ishan Bhaduri, Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Mr. K.P. Sahu, Mr. J.K. Gupta, Ms. Palak Dwivedi alongwith Mr. Shubham Dwivedi, Mr. Suresh Tandan, Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Mr. Pritendra Chauhan, Mr. Shrikant Kaushik, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Saxena, Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer, Mr. Pankaj Agrawal alongwith Ms. Preeti Yadav, Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Mr. Animesh Tiwari alongwith Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Ms. Shriyadeep Gupta, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Mr. Shikhar Shukla, Ms. Mamta Mahilange on behalf of Dr. Sudeep, Agrawal, Mr. Rudra Pratap Dubey, Mr. Ravitosh Kale on behalf of Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiyan, Ms. Seema Mishra & Mr. Vishal Sahu on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Ms. Madhunisha Singh with Ms. Aditi Joshi, Ms. Priyanka Rai, Ms. M. Asha, Mr. Shalin Singh Baghel, Mr. Vikhyat Arora, Advocates

Order :

Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.

1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in the bunch of these 1188 writ petitions, they are heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. WP(S) No. 11009/2025 Smt. Abha Namdeo vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others is being treated as lead case.

Prayers sought by the petitioners:

2. The petitioners have filed these petitions claiming grant of benefits of 1st and 2nd kramonnati on completion of 10 years service in light of order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 decided on 28.02.2024. The petitioners have also prayed for grant of consequential benefits to them from the date of completion of 10 years of service till the actual payment is made towards benefit of kramonnati. The petitioners have also prayed that this Court be pleased to pass an order holding that their cases are squarely covered from the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 decided on 28.02.2024. It has also been prayed that denial of kramonnati is discriminati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top