IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY, AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Hemant Kumar Baiga, S/o. Late Ramvuishal Baiga – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer – Respondent
Judgment :
Rajani Dubey, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 22.05.2019 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.). in S.T. No. 06/2019, whereby the appellant has been held guilty of commission of offence and sentenced as described below:-

2. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded from the impugned judgment and the records of the case, is that on the intervening night of 03.12.2018 at between 11pm-12am at village Badkapara, Surajpur, someone with an intention of killing Lal Sai Bargah assaulted on his head with an iron axe “tangi”. Thereafter, a morgue intimation was lodged in the police of Police Station Surajpur by Ambika Prasad Bargah, in which it was alleged that on 04.12.2018 at about 6:00 a.m. one Golu Rajwade of his vicinity informed him that the body of his father was lying nearby the house of the appellant and thereafter, an F.I.R. was lodged against the unknown person vide crime no. 490/18 by the complainant Ambika Prasad Baiga and the case was taken up for investigation. Subsequently, the police investigated the matter and on the basis of me

Convictions under Section 302 of IPC require corroborative evidence, and in the absence of reliable evidence, guilt cannot be established beyond reasonable doubt.
(1) Where case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence, chain of evidence must be so far complete, such that every hypothesis is excluded but one proposed to be proved and such circumstances must s....
Criminal Law – Appeal against conviction – Theory of last seen – Reliability of - The last seen theory comes into play where the time gap between point of time when Accused and deceased were seen las....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and conclusive chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; mere suspicion is ....
The prosecution must establish an unbroken chain of evidence beyond reasonable doubt for conviction, failing which the accused is entitled to acquittal.
Circumstantial evidence can establish guilt if it forms a complete chain pointing to the accused, even without direct evidence.
The court ruled that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the need for corroboration and the benefit of doubt for the accused.
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to establish a solid evidentiary basis results in acquittal.
The recovery of evidence must be unimpeachable and not shrouded with elements of doubt to sustain the guilt of the accused.
The conviction under Section 302 IPC was overturned due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and unreliable witness testimony, emphasizing the defendant's entitlement to the benefit of doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.