Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Mahendra Kumar Shrivastava, S/o. Late Shri C.P. Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Through The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited – Respondent
Order :
AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD, J.
1. Heard Mr. Bidya Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Varun Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to this case.
10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and set aside the impugned Order dated 06.10.2016 against the petitioner vide which the date of option of the Higher Pay Scale of SE (Civil) has been made effective from 01.04.2016 instead of making effective from 20.08.2016.
10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 to issue revised order making effective the due date of Option as 20.08.2016 keeping intact the other terms and conditions same as of the impugned Order dated 23.01.2018.
10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper together with the cost of the petition.”
3. Brief facts of the case, in nutshell, are that the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 23.01.2018 (Annexure P/1), whereby the respondents have unreasonably
The court upheld that all ACR entries must be communicated within a reasonable time, ruling that uncommunicated remarks cannot affect entitlements under service rules.
The arbitrary introduction of a cut-off date affecting an employee's entitlement to a promotional pay scale was held to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
The right to claim correct salary throughout the tenure of service cannot be defeated on account of delay, but the conscious decision of an employee not to exercise an option within a stipulated time....
Non-communication of adverse ACR within the stipulated time period can adversely affect a government servant's career and should not form the basis for denying benefits, as established by legal princ....
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004 under 5th CPC upgradation; prior judgments in rem mandate parity despite delay in ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
