Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Mangali Bai D/o Ramsingh – Appellant
Versus
Sakharam S/o Ramsingh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of second appeal and trial court findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on validity of adoption. (Para 3 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. findings on proving adoption and inheritance rights. (Para 6 , 7 , 19) |
| 4. judicial reasoning and error by the trial court. (Para 10 , 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 5. final ruling on inheritance rights. (Para 12 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI, J.
1. This is a Second Appeal filed by the plaintiffs under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.3.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, (FTC), Pendra Road in Civil Appeal No.123-A/02, which, in turn, arise out of the judgment and decree dated 3.10.2001 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.28-A/2000. By the impugned judgment and decree, the First Appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court.
2. The trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs/appellants, declaring their sole title over the suit property, holding that they alone, being the daughters of late Ramsingh, are entitled to inherit the same and the respondent/defendant has no legal right of inheritance
Customary law governs inheritance rights, emphasizing the necessity of proving adoption and community customs for legal validation.
Custom – Custom evolves by conduct – Customs too, like law, cannot remain stuck in time and others cannot be allowed to take refuge in customs or hide behind them to deprive others of their right.
The burden of proof for establishing a custom rests on the party asserting it, and clear and unambiguous evidence is required to prove the custom. The court emphasized the need for continuity, certai....
Section 2 (2) of Hindu Succession Act which is Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to members of any Scheduled Tribe within meaning of cla....
(1) Revenue records are not documents of title, but they are evidence of possession. (2) Succession—Customs are not fossilized structures, nor are they etched on stone but are living organism rooted ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
