SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Laldhar – Appellant
Versus
Somari (Deleted) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. J.K. Saxena, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer

JUDGMENT (CAV)

Heard on admission.

2. This is plaintiff’s Second Appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kunkuri District - Jashpur in Civil Appeal No. 2/2009, by which learned Additional District Judge has dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2009 passed by the Civil Judge Class-2, Kunkuri, District - Jashpur in Civil Suit No. 9-A/2008.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their status in Civil Suit No. 9-A/2008 before the trial Court.

4. The plaint averments, in brief, are that plaintiff filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge, Class II, Kunkuri on 27.08.2004 for declaration of title and confirmation of possession over the land bearing Khasra No. 18 Area 8738 Ha situated at P.H. No.19, Village - Jhargaon, Tahsil - Kunkuri, District - Jashpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the suit property’) mainly contending that :-

A. The plaintiff and the defendants are permanent residents of the village Jhargaon and by caste they are Gond which comes under the Scheduled Tribe category. They are governed by their local cu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top