Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY
Nehru son of Shri Dhanssai Dilawar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh through the Police Station Dabhra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. witness testimonies supporting the prosecution. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. legal standards for culpable homicide versus negligence. (Para 13 , 15 , 18) |
| 3. final verdict and modification of conviction. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajani Dubey, J.
Challenge in this appeal is to the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.4.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa in ST No.242/2006 whereby the appellant stands convicted under Sections 285 & 304 Part-II of IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for three months and RI for four years respectively.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the accused/appellant was running a fancy shop where he would sell petrol illegally without following safety measures. On 14.3.2005 at 7.30 pm while he was giving petrol to Sanjay in a jerrycan, the electricity went off. So the appellant lit a candle and at that time, as electricity supply restored the fan started moving, the flame of the candle began to flicker and the jerrycan containing petrol caught fire. Sanjay ran away from there. However, as the appellant threw the burning jerrycan out of his shop, it fell over dece
The distinction between culpable homicide and negligent act hinges on the presence of knowledge about the act likely causing death.
The court clarified that actions under intoxication leading to death may constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder, not murder itself.
The court established that sudden provocation and lack of premeditation can allow conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.
Knowledge of likely fatal consequences in reckless driving can elevate culpable homicide to be charged under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 304A IPC.
Point of Law : Crimes against women are not ordinary crimes committed in a fit of anger or for property. They are social crimes. They disrupt the entire social fabric. Hence, they call for harsh puni....
A statement can be treated as a dying declaration under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act, constituting valid evidence if it inspires confidence, even if it was recorded under Section 161 of CrPC, an....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
