SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ANAND PATHAK, HIRDESH, JJ.
Bhura Alias Kamlesh – Appellant 
Versus 
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.3459 Of 2019
Decided On : 20-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Ashok Kumar Jain- learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Shri A. K. Nirankari- learned Public Prosecutor

A statement can be treated as a dying declaration under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act, constituting valid evidence if it inspires confidence, even if it was recorded under Section 161 of CrPC, and can be the basis for conviction if it establishes intent to kill.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Conviction and sentencing for murder - Appellant convicted for setting victim on fire, leading to death two weeks later - Conviction based on dying declaration and corroborative evidence. (Paras 1, 35, 57)

(B) Dying Declaration - Admissibility as valid evidence - A statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC can constitute a dying declaration if made by an injured person shortly before death, and it inspires full confidence. (Paras 20, 35)

(C) Intention and Knowledge - Elements of culpable homicide - Culpable homicide can amount to murder if committed with intent to kill or knowledge of likely death. (Paras 299, 300)

(D) Reasonable Doubt - Acquittal on lesser charges where evidence is lacking; prosecution must establish case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 10, 38, 57)

Facts of the case:
Complainant sustained severe burns after accused poured petrol on him and ignited it during a dispute over payment for tea. Tests confirmed presence of petrol in burnt clothing. The complainant later died from burn injuries after making statements against the accused. (Paras 1-7, 57)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction of the appellant under Section 302 was upheld as the act was premeditated, with no extenuating circumstances. (Paras 57, 58)

Issues: The court considered whether the dying declaration was admissible and if the evidence established a murder charge rather than lesser culpable homicide. (Paras 19, 57)

Ratio Decidendi: Evidence supported the conclusion that the accused had the intention to kill; hence the act constituted murder rather than culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC. (Paras 56, 57)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. summary of accusation and initial proceedings (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. appellant's arguments against the conviction (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court's observations on the admissibility of evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. legal principles concerning dying declarations (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. medical evidence related to victim's injuries and death (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
7. court's final reasoning and decision (Para 35 , 56 , 57)
8. conclusion and order of the court (Para 58 , 59)

JUDGMENT :

Hirdesh, J.

1.Being dissatisfied with the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26-03-2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Chachoda, District Guna(MP) in Sessions Trial No.21 of 2017, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo Imprisonment for Life with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months' rigorous imprisonment, this appeal was filed.

2. Case of prosecution, in brief, is that on 15-11-2016, complainant- Rajendra Singh Kurmi was admitted in a burnt condition in Burn Ward of District Hospital, Guna where Duty Dr.V.S. Raghuvanshi (PW-10) sent an information to PS Kotwali, Guna along-with MLC Ex.P16 and complaint Ex.P15. On receiving information, ASIMd. Zaheer (PW-11) reached District Hospital, Guna where complainant- Rajendra Singh Kurmi admitted in Burn Ward, inter alia alleging that on 15-11-2016, around 5:00 pm, he was sitting at his tea-stall (gumti) in Village Sanai. Accused- Bhura (appellant herein) came there and asked him to make four-five cups of tea for him. It was further stated by complainant- Rajendra that he made tea and gave it to accused Bhura. When he asked Bhura to pay money for the tea, without any reason accused- Bhura started abusing him in filthy language. When resisted, then accused- Bhura poured a cane full of petrol kept in shop on him with an intention to kill him and took out a matchstick, lit it and threw it on him, due to which his body caught fire and he got burnt. Lakhan Singh (PW-1), Pappu Mali (PW-2) and Chandan Singh (PW-3), who were present on spot, saved him. Thereafter, accused- Bhura fled away from there.

3. Lakhan Singh and Sonu Kurmi brought him to District Hospital, Guna. On the basis of such information, ASI Md. Zaheer (PW-11) recorded dehati nalishi Ex.P11 at No.0/2016 under Sections 307 , 294 of IPC . On the basis of such dehati nalishi (Ex.P11), which on being received at PS Kotwali Guna, Crime at No.0 of 2016 was registered vide Ex.P12 by Head Constable Pradeep Bhargav (PW7) on 16.11.2016. As crime occurred within the jurisdiction of Kumbhraj Police Station, therefore, FIR at Crime No.391/2016 for offence under and 294 of was registered at PS Kumbhraj.

4. During that time, complainant Rajendra was referred from District Hospital, Guna to Bhopal, Hamidia Hospital where he was treated by Dr. Rahul Shrivastava (PW14) and Dr. Manish Kumar (PW13). MLC Report and case-sheet were prepared vide Ex.D5(1) and Ex.D5(47). Rajendra died during treatment on 22.11.2016. His postmortem was conducted by Dr. Rajendra Barat (PW8) vide Postmortem report Ex.P13. Panchnama of dead body of deceased Rajendra was prepared vide Ex.P9.

5. Further, case of prosecution is that Police In-charge PS Kumbhraj Vijay Kumar Sen (PW12) recorded statement of Rajendra (since deceased) under Section 161 of CrPC during his treatment in District Hospital, Guna vide Ex.P18. On 17.11.2016, he reached Village Sanai & prepared spot map vide Ex.P2. On the same day, statements of witnesses- Lakhan Singh, Pappu Mali, Chandan Bheel, Ashok Kurmi and Purushottam were recorded vide Ex.P1 to Ex.P7 & Ex.D1 respectively. On 17.11.2016, Police in- Charge Vijay Kumar Sen also seized a half burnt light blue shirt, a white-checked vest (banyan), a hundred rupee note shrunk due to burning, a plastic cane lying on spot containing about half of liter of petrol and matchbox

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top