SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 476

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
QRG ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA ELECTRICALS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANMOHAN SINGH, MUKUL ROHTAGI, Valmiki Mehta

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

( 1 ) ALONG with the suit which inter alia seeks a decree for permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the word havell s as its mark or as part of its corporate name, plaintiffs sought interim injunction as per prayer made in IA No. 7880/2004. On 25. 11. 2004 an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted to the plaintiffs restraining the defendants its Chairman, Directors, Promoters, Officers, Servants, Agents and any one acting on their behalf from using the mark havell s or the corporate name havell s Electronics Pvt. Ltd. on any of their brochures, products and packaging. By means of IA 75/2005, defendants pray that the ex parte ad interim injunction be vacated. Arguments were heard on both applications on 31. 1. 2005. Plaintiffs filed IA No. 1906/2005 and prayed for leave to file some documents which as per plaintiffs were relevant for determination of the issues raised. Application was allowed vide order dated 10. 3. 2005. Defendants were granted liberty to file documents in rebuttal. Needful has seen done by the defendants.

( 2 ) ONE Shri Haveli Ram Gandhi commenced business in electrical goods in the year 1942 and traded under the n





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top