BADAR DURREZ AHMED
OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) -THE petitioner is accused of having committed offences under Sections 376 (2) (g)/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ipc ). The petitioner claims bail-on-default under the provisions of Proviso (a) (ii) to Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the crpc ). Therefore, some dates would be relevant. The First Information Report (FIR) was registered at Police station Sameypur Badli on 17. 2. 2005. He was arrested on the same day. On 18. 2. 2005, he was remanded to judicial custody and continues to be in custody. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner the charge-sheet was required to be filed within 60 days from the date of the first remand i. e. , 18. 2. 2005. Since the charge-sheet had not been filed by 18. 4. 2005 (the date, when, the 60 days period came to an end) the petitioner on 4. 5. 2005 filed an application before the Magistrate claiming release on bail in terms of Proviso (a) (ii) to Section 167 (2) of Crpc. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed on 12. 5. 2005. When the said application came to be disposed of on 21. 5. 2005,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.