SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 297

B.C.PATEL, BADAR DURREZ AHMED
TOBACCO PVT. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.MADHAV RAO, AMIT GUPTA, Jatin Arora, RAJIV SHAKDHAN, VISHVANATH HIRANATH

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of Pan Masala (Gutkha ). Earlier, the petitioner was classyfying this product under sub-heading No. 2404. 49 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and was paying 16% basic excise duty and 24% special excise duty on the basis of an approved classification list. Subsequently, the petitioner, on receipt of a letter dated 31. 10. 2000, from the Central Excise Department, filed a fresh classification list and started clearing the aforesaid goods by classifying the same under heading No. 24. 04 and paid Central excise duty accordingly. A show cause notice dated 27. 11. 2001 was issued to the petitioner contending that in respect of the period prior to 28. 02. 2001, the said goods were classifiable under heading 2106. 00 and that the petitioner was liable to pay duty for the period upto 28. 02. 2001. The petitioner filed a reply to the said show cause notice and after considering such reply, the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise passed an order-in-original No. 61/02 dated 17. 05. 2002 confirming the duty demanded.

( 2 ) THIS is the background leading to the main issue involved in this writ petit






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top