A.K.SIKRI, B.C.PATEL
NAGINCHAND GODHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ). Petitioner has approached this Court by filing this petition, inter alia, praying that by issuance of appropriate writ, the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) bearing no. F. 15 (III) / 59/lsg and notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 12. 11. 1968 bearing No. F. 4 (98)/65-Landh be quashed and set aside and the respondent be directed to denotify the land in question.
( 2 ). After the issuance of the notifications, as aforesaid, award has been made which was challenged before this Court by filing civil writ petition No. 1589/86. This petition was dismissed. It may be noted that the petitioner had no right or title to file the petition, as the land at the relevant time stood in the name of his father and the petition was also filed by his father. The contention raised before the Court is that the application under Section 48 (1) of the Act is made to the Lt. Governor for denotifying the land in question. On notice being issued, Suresh P. Padhy has filed an affidavit on behalf of the DDA and has pointed out as under:
"6. That these Khasra numbers were the subject matter of CWP 1539 of 198
REFERRED TO : Ajit Singh v. Union of India
Awadh Bihari Yadava v. State of Bihar
Balwant Narayan Bhagde v. M.D.Bhagwat
Delhi Development Authority v. Prasadi
Puran Singh v. Lt. Governor, Delhi
Rajasthan Housing Board v. Shiv Kishan
Ramniklal N. Bhutta v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.