S.N.KAPUR
STANDARD PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GYAN CHAND JAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these matters, the question of condonation of delay is required to be decided along with interpretation of term "rent".
( 2 ) FIRST the facts are given in brief hereinbelow to appreciate the respective contention of the parties. On 1st April, 198 the premises in question was let out to m/s. Standard Pharmaceutical Ltd. 24, Park Street, Calcutta. The case of the plaintiff respondent was that after the lapse of 11 years, rent was increased from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 2,500/- w. e. f. 1/04/1983 after and five years the rent was further increased to Rs. 3,000. 00 w. e. f. 1/04/1988. The plaintiff landlord by notice dated 5/01/1991 after the amended Rent Control Act came into force on 1/12/1988 - gave a notice and increased the rent by 10%. Consequently, the rent became Rs. 3,300. 00 per month w. e. f. 1/04/1991. The defendant paid the rent at the rate of Rs. 3,300. 00 per month upto 31/07/1991. Thereafter, they failed to pay the rent. The plaintiff filed a petition for eviction before the Rent controller. The proceedings before the Rent Controller continued. On 14/02/1994, the defendant in terms of Section 6a read with Section 8 of the D. R. C. Act gave a notice increasi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.