( 1 ) A large number of Letters Patent Appeals have been filed against the judg- ment of the learned Single Judge dated 22. 2. 1992 by which a large number of writ peti- tion were disposed of. The questions of law involved in these appeals are exactly identical, therefore, we propose to dispose of these appeals by one common judgment. The learned Single Judge also disposed of all the writ petitions by a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE learned Single Judge has dealt with the facts of one writ petition. We also deem it appropriate to reiterate the facts of only LPA No. 58/1992 arising out of writ petition No. 1110/89 in order to appreciate the controversy involved in the case.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 joined the appellant company on 1/06/1943. On 2. 1. 1964 he was allotted-a residential quarter in the premises of the appellant mill. The respon- dent retired from service on 6. 6. 1983. The respondent was allotted a quarter on leave and licence basis on the specific condition that he would vacate the accommodation within 4 days of cessation of the service by the management. Admittedly till date the respondent has not vacated the quarter which is the main grievance of the appel