SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 332

S.N.KAPUR, USHA MEHRA
PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harjinder Singh, K.C.MITTAL

Usha Mehra, J.

( 1 ) DELHI Police Act, 1978 (hereinafter called the Act) was enacted with the purpose lo bridge the conflicting relationship between the police and the Magistracy. It was difficult for the police to handle certain law and order problems. To overcome these problems it was fell expedient to provide Police Commissioner system in Delhi. Therefore, the Act was enacted which came in force on 1st day of July, 1978. The Bombay Police Act, 1951 was the tested testament for the Police Commissioner system. Therefore, number of provisions of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 have been incorporated in the Act, thus most of the provisions of the Act and in particular Sections 50 and 47 of the Act are analogous to the provisions of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. One of the time tested measure to prevent commission of crime is to snap criminal links of certain class of persons wh other persons having criminal bent of mind. Section 47 of the Act deals with the removal of persons about to commit offences. Under this Section Commissioner of Police has been empowered with vide powers but betore doing so the Commissioner of Police has to satisfy that the criteria laid down under the Act has bee























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top