K.S.GUPTA
PANDIT MUNSHI RAM AND ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Counciliation Act, 1996 was filed by M/s. Pandit Munshi Ram and Associates Pvt. Ltd, interalia, alleging that it was awarded the work of construction of 288, Janta Flats for Harijans at Vasant Gaon, New Delhi and a formal agreement being No. 88/ee/s. W. D-7/d. D. A. /a/89-90 executed between the parties also contained an arbitration clause No. 25. The petitioner sent a letter dated 6th December 1997 to the Engineer Member of DDA who is the persona-designata for appointment of arbitrator in terms of the said arbitration clause, to appoint an arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences which had arisen be- tween the parties. Respondent-DDA in reply to the said letter demanded an applica- tion in requisite proforma vide their letter dated 24th February 1998. Vide its letter dated 3/6th April 1998 the petitioner sent the requisite proforma to the Engineer- Member for appointing an arbitrator. It is further alleged that the petitioner received letter CE (SWZ)/fo/18 (46)98/arbn. /2209 dated 22nd September 1-998 from the respondent-DDA whereby it refused to appoint an arbitrator on the ground of claims deemed
G. Ramachandra Reddy and Co. v. Chief Engineer Military Engineering Service
Jai Chand Bhasin v. Union of India and Another
Kerala SEB v. I.P. Kunhaliumma
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd.
Major (Retd) Inder Singh Rekhi v. Delhi Development Authority
Major (Retd) Inder Singh Rekhi v. Delhi Development Authority
Neginbhai C. Patel v. Union of India
Prafulla Kumar Singh Deo v. State of Orissa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.