SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 777

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
PREMWATI BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
GANPATI INTERNATIONAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKUL ROHTAGI, S.K.BANSAL, Y.R.GROVER

Vikramajit Sen

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has brought this suit under Sections 105 and 106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 as well as under Section 51 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 seeking the relief of permanent injunction and rendition of accounts. The case disclosed in the plaint is that the plaintiff is the proprietor of the trade mark hariyali LABEL in relation to rice which was adopted on 1. 4. 1993 and has been continuously in use thereafter. It is averred that in order to acquire statutory rights for the trade mark HARIYALI LABEL, an application in Clause 30 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 was filed on 9. 8. 1996 and this application is still pending. It is further averred that the plaintiff is the proprietor in the artistic feature of HARIYALI LABEL and that she holds its copyright. An application for registration under Section 45 (1) of the Copyright Act was filed by her on 22. 2. 1999 and No Objection Certificate was granted by Registrar, Trade Marks on 7. 7. 1999. Since the plaint is dated 16. 7. 1999 it is obvious that this Certificate is springboard for the litigation. It is further averred that the trade mark HARIYALI LABEL has become distinct






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top