SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 213

C.M.NAYAR
UTTAM SINGH DUGGAL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.AGARWAL, R.K.WATEL

C. M. Nayar, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of the objections filed by the respondent Union of India under Sections 16,30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 against the Award dated August 11,1995.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the claimants entered into an Agreement with the respondent Union of India for construction of Main Atheletic Stadium at Lodhi Road. Complex, New Delhi-SH: Structural RCC Framework Group-I vide Agreement No. EE/ci/ag/80-81/1. The disputes and differences arose between the parties and Mr. S. S. Juneja, Arbitrator in the Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment, New Delhi was appointed by the Chief Engineer (NDZ) I CPWD, New Delhi under his letter No. 4 (32)83-A and C (NDZ) dated July 15, 1991 as Sole Arbitrator to decide and make the Award regarding the disputes falling within the purview of Clause 25 of the Agreement executed between the parties. The claimants filed the statement of claims containing 14 claims and the respondents filed the counter statement of facts alongwith three counter-claims while repudiating the contentions raised in the claims statement.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the respondents has only impugned the findings in










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top