( 1 ) THE petitioner M/s Kochhar Construction Works filed a petition under Sections 14, 17 and 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing the award given by Shri K. K. Reddy dated 29th August 1994 and making it rule of the court.

( 2 ) DELHI Development Authority, the respondent filed objection against the award vide IA 1858/95.

( 3 ) RELEVANT facts in brief are as follows: The petitioner entered into a contract with the respondent No. 1 for the work of construction of 84 LIG DUS at D-1/c Janak Puri, New Delhi vide agreement No. 73/ee/hdvii/81-82. Certain disputes arose and in terms of the arbitration clause, the matter was REFERRED TO to Shri K. K. Reddy who gave the award.

( 4 ) THE award is being challenged by the objectors DDA basically on the ground that learned Arbitrator has only indicated conclusions reached by him and failed to give any reasons or to disclose his thought process or the basis for awarding various amounts in respect of claim No. 1 (items 2,3 and 4) and claim Nos. 8, 9 and 10

( 5 ) BEFORE proceeding further and considering individual claims, the relevant part of clause 25 of the agreement is being reproduced for proper appreciation. It reads a