SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1281

A.K.SIKRI
SHUMITA DIDI SANDHU – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY SINGH SANDHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brajesh Kumar Srivastava, CHETAN SHARMA, KAMINI JAISWAL, RAKESH TIKKU, S.S.Jauhar


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the wife of the defendant No. 1 and daughter-in-law of defendant Nos. 2 and 3. For some reasons her matrimonial alliance with the defendant No. 1 has not been blissful. There are allegations of extra marital relations by the plaintiff against the defendant No. 1 and vice versa. Interestingly, both the spouses virtually accept the accusations levelled against each other, if not overtly, at least tacitly. At this stage, having regard to the nature of present proceedings, it would not be necessary to dig deep into these accusations. Suffice is to mention that though they have not put an end to this jural relationship, they have not been living as husband and wife for quite some time and there exists no bonding between the two. The suit filed by the plaintiff is for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from forcibly dispossessing her from suit property bearing no. 18-A, Ring Road, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delh. Reason for impleading her in-laws in the present suit is that they are the owners of the aforesaid property (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit property' ).

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that the suit property is her matrimo




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top