SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 171

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
RAJEEV MEHRA – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR KUMAR SACHDEV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr P Banerjee, Advocate
Ms Nitya Ramakrishnan and Mr Sarim Naved, Advocates

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The plaintiff seeks decree for specific performance of an agreement of sale of immovable property under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. The application has been filed after the framing of issues.

.2. The plaintiff instituted the suit on 19th January, 2004 on the averments that the defendant had vide agreement to sell dated 15th February, 2001 agreed to sell the full terrace rights above the second floor of the building situated on plot of land admeasuring 725 square yards and bearing No. 33, NH-IV, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi 110 024 for a total sale consideration of Rs 40 lacs out of which the plaintiff had paid Rs 15 lacs at the time of agreement to sell on 15th February, 2001 and remaining sale consideration was payable at the time of execution of the sale deed after conversion of lease hold rights in the land underneath into freehold. The plaintiff claimed that on 15th February, 2001 the defendant in part performance of the agreement to sell had handed over the vacant, physical possession of the said open terrace to the plaintiff and which fact was also mentioned in the agreement to sell. Besides the agreement to sell, a receipt and an affidavit, also stated to hav














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top