HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Salman Khurshid ...Plaintiff
Versus
Delhi Public School Society & Anr. ...Defendants
I.A No. 10680/2008 in CS (OS) No. 1844/2008
Decided on: 27th October, 2009
(B) Natural Justice—Principles of natural justice in cases of Tribunals and Government authorities cannot be equated with cases of expulsion of members—Allegation of mala fide is a question of fact and has to be proved at the time of trial [Paras 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 44]
MANMOHAN SINGH, J.
1. By this order, I shall dispose of I.A. No. 10680/2008 filed by the plaintiff in CS (OS) No. 1844/2008 wherein the plaintiff has sought the ex parte stay of operation of letter dated 1st September, 2008 and the confirmation of the said order after notice.
2. The Plaintiff herein has filed the present suit for declaration and mandatory injunction seeking prohibitory orders against his expulsion from the Delhi Public School Society (hereinafter referred to as the „defendant society?). By doing so, the plaintiff has assailed the letter issued by the Chairman of the defendant society on 1st September, 2008 through which the plaintiff was informed of the reasons for his expulsion and thereafter called upon to withdraw from the society by invocation of Rule II (7) of Rules and Regulations of the defendant society. The plaintiff has challenged the said letter dated 1st September, 2008 on several grounds in the present suit. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed the present application under consideration for stay of the operation of the impugned letter.
3. The brief factual matrix which has led to filing of the present suit can be summarized as follows. The Plaintiff is stated to be a member of the defendant society since the year 1984. The plaintiff has made high claims about his immense contribution towards the defendant society and his tenure as a president of the same which initiated in 1993 and continued till 2004.
4. The defendant is stated to be a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and was formed in the year 1949. The Society at the time of filing of the present suit consisted of the following members :
i) Sh. Salman Khurshid
ii) Dr. A. R. Kidwai
iii) Sh. Inderjit Seth
iv) Lt. Gen. J.S. Bawa
v) Dr. (Mrs.) Usha Luthra
vi) Justice B.N. Kirpal (Retd.)
vii) Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia
viii) Sh. V. R. Vaish
ix) Sh. Pramod Grover
x) Sh. Ashok Chandra
xi) Sh. Narender Kumar
xii) Sh. V. M. Thapar
xiii) Sh. Khushwant Singh
xiv) Justice N.N. Goswamy (Retd.)
xv) Dr. (Miss.) A. Nanda
xvi) Sh. V. Shunglu
xvii) Ms. Shovana Narayan
xviii) Admiral I.C. Chopra
xix) Mr. Ravi Vira Gupta
xx) Sh. S. L. Dhawan
xxi) Sh. B. P. Khandelwal
xxii) Ms. Sharda Nayak
5. The plaintiff in the suit discusses the objects of the defendant society and other rules of the society to explain the structure of the society. The said objects and rules as explained in detail on pages 3 to 6 of the plaint are reproduced as under :
“The Memorandum of Association of Delhi Public School Society includes the following significant provisions:-
1. Objects: The objects of the Society shall be:-
(i) To establish progressive schools or other educational institutions in Delhi or outside Delhi, open to all without any distinction of race or creed or caste or special status with a view.
(ii) To impart sound and liberal education to boys and girls during their impressionable years – a type of education that will lay stress on character building, team work, physical development and will infuse in school children a spirit of adventure, fair play and justice.
(iii) To develop among its students a feeling of pride in Indian culture and to produce citizens who will be truly Indian and will rise above social, communal, religious or provincial prejudices.
Rule II(1)
II. Membership
1. For the purpose of registration the Society is declared to consist of 20 members but it may, when it thinks fit, register an increase of members subject to the total membership not exceeding 30 (including the Education member if he is not a member of the society) see VIII, 2 below, at any time excluding ex officio members (Principals of Higher Secondary Schools and Education Member, if he is not a member of the Society)
Rule II (2) (i)
2(i) There may be a President and a Vice President of the Society who will be ipso facto members of the Society and the Working Committee and would be invited to attend any meetings of these bodies.
Rule II (7)
7) The Chairman of
1. K.L Tripathi v. State Bank of India and Ors.
2. Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v. B.N. Ganguly and Ors.
4. Escorts Farms v. Commissioner Kumaon Division
5. D. Dwarkanath Reddy v. Chaitanya Bharathi Education Society
6. T.P. Davia v. Lodge Victoria
7. Institute of Chartered Accountants v. L.K. Ratna
8. LIC of India v. Consumer Education & Research Centre
11. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
12. T.P. Davia v. Victoria Lodge
13. Zoroastrian Coop Housing Society v. Dist Registrar
15. M.H. Devendrappa v. State of Karnataka
16. Delhi Abhibhavak Mansangh v. Union of India
17. Central Inland Water Transport v. Brij Nath Ganguly Corp.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.