SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 805

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR, JJ.
VHCPL-ADCC PINGALAI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. AND ANR............ Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS..... Respondents
W.P.(C) No.13034/2009
Decided on : 10.8.2005

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arunabh Chowdhary, Mr. Anupam Lal Das and Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Advocates
Mr. G. E. Vahanvati, Attorney General of India and Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Atul Nanda, Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr. Rahul Malik, Advs. for Respondent no. 1/UOI Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG with Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Rishabh Sancheti and Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Advs. For Respondent no.2 Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shivaji, Advs. for respondent no.3

Headnote:A) Constitution of India, 1950-Arts.14, 19(1)(g), 226- As matters raised by this writ petition go beyond contractual question and contain assertion violation of constitutional provision, it is maintainable.

       B) Words and Phrases:- Meaning of Words of “augmentation” and “capacity” explained.

       C) National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 48:- Petitioner who had been awarded the contract of laying four lane national highway failed to prove that the allotting work to Respondent No:3 through concession is identical and support the contention that work which is part of project awarded to respondent No.3 could be considered as providing desired level of services to users of project facility or that there is substantial development or enhancement or improvements undertaken so far as Pingalai River bridge or its approach roads are concerned –

       D) National Highways Act, 1956 -Section 48:- Decision of the Respondent No:2 and 3 to allot the construction of four lane National Highway through concession agreement cannot be challenged by the petitioner who had not participated in the bid or in the absence of any charge of mala fides or on Wednesbury principle of unreasonableness or without proving that it is collateral to the work awarded to him.

       E) Precedent – A clause that follows a coma cannot be held to govern a clause preceding the coma

       F) Constitution of India Article 12:- State as well as every authority covered under this Article shall be governed by well settled principles of fair play in awarding largesse of the State.

       G) Tenders -While awarding public contracts, apart from financial concerns it is alsonecessary to take into account many other important considerations like technical innovation, nature of project, objects of economic, social and or industrial developments and other concerns.

       H) Judicial Review – In order to prevent arbitrariness and favoritism, exercise of the power to grant contract also are subjected to principles of judicial review.

       I) National Highway Act, 1956 - Section 48 - National Highway Authority of India Act, 1982 - Sections 3, 11, 14, 15 – Petitioners can challenge any action of the Respondent whenever it crystallizes in the form of decision to buy back the tolling rights under the contract or to exclude the petitioner from participating in any bid for tenders to lay down four lane national Highway.,

       J) National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 48:- Writ petition challenging the award of the contract is not maintainable for delay and laches as well as petitioner is guilty of concealment of material facts.

JUDEMENT

GITA MITTAL, J 1. "A mans greed is like a snake that wants to swallow an elephant".

-a Chinsese proverb which completely sums up the case in hand.

The petitioner, who was awarded a contract for the construction and operation of a project involving a major bridge over the Pingalai river with approaches covering a total stretch of 2.2 km, claims that the Concession Agreement entered into by him in 2004 tantamounts to his having a preferential right of first refusal for award of the contract relating to the project for the four laning of a 66.73 Kms stretch of National Highway-6, being its Talegaon-Amravati KM 100 to KM 166.725 section, in the State of Maharashtra, without participation in the bidding process and completely unmindful of the public interest involved in the matter.

2. The record of the present case discloses, that on behalf of the MORT&H, the Public Works Department of the Government of Maharashtra had invited tenders for this project from eligible persons of construction, operation and maintenance of a major bridge and its approaches across the Pingalai river in KM 113/800 on the Nagpur-Edlabad Road section of N.H.6 with private sector participation on build, operate and transfer ('BOT') basis. It appears that a Memorandum of Understanding dated st February, 2003 (Schedule 'V') was entered into by two companies, Vishvaraj Housing Company Pvt. Ltd. and ADCC Computing and Research Centre Ltd. Pursuant thereto, a consortium formed by them for the purpose of bidding for the project, had submitted a bid for the project.

3. The MORT&H accepted the bid submitted by the said consortium and issued a letter of acceptance dated 4th July, 2003. As per the requirements of the tender/bid, this consortium incorporated the 'concessionaire'-petitioner herein, as a special purpose vehicle to implement the said project on BOT basis. Pursuant to the aforesaid acceptance letter, on 14th May, 2004, the President of India represented by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways of the Government of India entered into a 'Concession Agreement' with the VHCPL-ADCC Pingalai Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (the petitioner herein), who has been referred to as the 'concessionaire' in the agreement.

4. The work which forms subject matter of the agreement is described in schedule A of the Concession Agreement and is referred to as "the project" therein. The agreement was entered into on behalf of the President of India by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (hereinafter referred to as MORT&H) which is responsible for the development and maintenance of national highways in India.

5. Learned senior counsels for all the parties have extensively relied on the terms of the Concession Agreement dated 14th May, 2004, essential terms whereof are as follows :-

"xxxx xxxx xxxx

F. In accordance with the requirements of the said tender/bid submitted by the Consortium, the Consortium has incorporated the Concessionaire as a" special purpose vehicle to implement the Project on BOT basis, and GOI has agreed to grant to the Concessionaire, the Concession (as hereinafter defined) on the terms, conditions and covenants hereinafter set forth in this Agreement."

xxxx xxxx xxxx

Definitions & Interpretations :-

"Project" means the project described in Schedule 'A' which the Concessionaire is required to design, engineer, finance, construct, operate, maintain and transfer in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement."

"Project Assets" means all physical and other assets relating to and forming part of the Project including but not limited to (i) rights over the Project Site in the form of license, right of way or otherwise, (ii)tangible assets such as civil works including the foundations, embankments, pavements, road surface, interchanges, bridges, approaches to bridges and flyovers, road overbridges, drainage works, lighting facilities, traffic signals, sign boards, milestones, toll plaza, equipment for the collection of tolls or rel







































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top