VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1. In challenge in this revision petition is the order dated 20.04.2009 passed by Sh. Balwant Rai Bansal, ARC (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in E-380/08 titled as “Sh. Mukesh Kumar Vs. Sh. Rishi Prakash” whereby the learned ARC has granted to the respondent tenant, the leave to defend the eviction petition preferred by the petitioner/landlord under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

2. Undisputedly, the petitioner is the landlord in respect of premises let out to the respondent comprising of one room situated at the second floor of property bearing no.3649, Gali Rura Acharwali, Chawri Bazar, Delhi, 110006 as shown in red colour in the site plan filed by the petitioner/landlord as annexure „A' with the eviction petition. The respondent was inducted as a tenant in the said premises on 08.12.1980 at a monthly rent of Rs. 75/-. It was enhanced to Rs. 99/- per month w.e.f. 01.07.2001. The petitioner claims that the same was further enhanced to Rs. 600/- per month by issuing a notice in consonance with the decision of this court in Raghunandan Saran Ashok Saran (HUF) Vs. UOI 95 (2002) DLT 508 (DB). However, according to the respondent the r