BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

1. This writ petition has been preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 10.07.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. By virtue of the impugned order dated 10.07.2012, the Tribunal has dismissed three Original Applications being OA No. 4640/2011, OA No. 156/2012 and OA No. 313/2012 as also the C.P. No. 407/2012 arising out of OA No. 313/201 while upholding the relieving order issued by Respondent No.2 requiring the incumbent, namely, Vinod Kumar Sandlesh to relinquish charge of the post held by him at Johannesburg. It may be pointed out that all the three Original Applications were filed on behalf of the petitioner Vinod Kumar Sandlesh against the same set of Respondents, except that in OA No. 313/2012, a private Respondent No.3 (Sh. Anwar Haleem, Dy Director, ICCR) was also impleaded as a party, in addition to other common respondents.

The facts:

2. The necessary facts are stated below:-

2.1 In 1987, the Petitioner joined the Central Translation Bureau as a permanent employee of the Central Government. An advertisement was published on behalf of Indian Council f