D.MURUGESAN, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Ram Gopal Singh Sisodia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
D. MURUGESAN, J
1. This writ petition in the form of pro bono publico petition has been filed by one Sh.Ram Gopal Singh Sisodia seeking for a direction to issue a writ of quo warranto quashing the nomination of Sh.Sachin Tendulkar as a member of Rajya Sabha (Council of States) as made by the President of India. The petitioner is the Editor-in-Chief of Jan Chetna, a National Weekly Newspaper. He is Ex-Member of Metropolitan Council/Ex-Member of Legislative Assembly, Delhi.
2. The petitioner alleges that he came to know from the newspaper reports, widely published that Sh.Sachin Tendulkar, the respondent No.3 herein has been nominated to Rajya Sabha as one of the members under Article 80 of the Constitution of India. The grievance is that under Clause (1)(a) of Clause (3) of Article 80 of the Constitution of India, Sh.Sachin Tendulkar cannot be nominated as a member of Rajya Sabha as Cricket cannot be brought under anyone of the categories enumerated under the said Article. Therefore, the nomination of Sh.Sachin Tendulkar is invalid and unconstitutional.
3. Article 80 of the Constitution of India relating to the nomination of a person to be a member to the Council of States,
1. Padmasundara Rao vs. State of T.N.
3. Indira Nehru Gandhi, vs. Raj Narain
4. Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union Of India
5. Synthetics and Chemical Ltd. Etc. vs. State of U.P. and others
6. Krishan Lal Gera v. State of Haryana
7. Laxman Balwant Bhopatkar v. Charity Commissioner, Bombay
9. Good Year India Ltd v. Collector of Customs
10. Central Bank of India v. Ravindra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.