VIPIN SANGHI
KARAN MADAAN – Appellant
Versus
NAGESHWAR PANDEY – Respondent
Vipin Sanghi, J.
I.A. Nos. 1111/2013 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of counter-claim filed by the defendant) and 1112/2013 (under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for passing a decree on admission in the suit)
1. The present suit has been filed by three plaintiffs. Plaintiffs No.1 & 2 are businessmen and plaintiff No.3 is the mother of plaintiff No.2. The case of the plaintiffs is that the defendant was the sole and exclusive owner of built-up property bearing No. EC-5, Inderpuri, New Delhi – 110 012 admeasuring 500 sq. yds. situated in the area of village Naraina, Delhi (the suit property). The plaintiffs state that by way of a registered sale deed dated 01.11.2011, the defendant transferred the suit property to the plaintiffs for a total consideration of Rs.1,65,00,000/-. The plaintiffs claim that the respective shares of the three plaintiffs in the suit property is as follows:
(i) Plaintiff No. 1’s share being 66.66%
(ii) Plaintiff No. 2’s share being 23.34%
(iii) Plaintiff No. 3’s share being 10%
2. The sale deed was registered as document No. 13,180 in Book No.I Volume No. 6,205 at pages 64-74 on 02.12.2011 in the office of the Sub-Registrar No. IX, New Delhi. The plaintif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.