G.P.MITTAL
Nathia – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Imtiaz – Respondent
G.P. Mittal, J.
CM.APPL 939/2015(delay)
1. Notice.
2. Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent no.3 accepts notice.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 69 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. The application stands disposed of.
MAC. APP. 61/2015
5. Notice.
6. Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent no.3 accepts notice.
7. The learned counsel for the Appellants states that it is a short matter and can be disposed of at this stage. The learned counsel for Respondent no.3 has no objection to the same.
8. On finding that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of vehicle no.DL-1LK-7011 which resulted in fatal injuries to the deceased Nawab @ Nabi Baksh, the Claims Tribunal in the absence of any evidence with regard to the deceased’s income took the minimum wages of an unskilled worker as Rs.7,722/- per month, made addition of 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards personal and living expenses and applied the multiplier of 13 to determine the loss of dependency.
9. The compensa
Rajesh & Ors. v. Rajbir Singh & Ors.
Reshma Kumari v. Madan Mohan [(2009) 13 SCC 422 : (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 143 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 1044]
Santosh Devi v. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
Sanjay Verma v. Haryana Roadways
Safiya Bee v. Mohd. Vajahath Hussain @ Fasi
Abati Bezbaruah v. Geological Survey of India
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.