SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 253

G.P.MITTAL
Nathia – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Imtiaz – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:Navneet Goyal with Rupika Singh, Advocates
For the Respondents:R3, Saral Chaturvedi, Suman Bagga, Advocates

JUDGMENT:-

G.P. Mittal, J.


CM.APPL 939/2015(delay)

1. Notice.

2. Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent no.3 accepts notice.

3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 69 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

4. The application stands disposed of.

MAC. APP. 61/2015

5. Notice.

6. Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent no.3 accepts notice.

7. The learned counsel for the Appellants states that it is a short matter and can be disposed of at this stage. The learned counsel for Respondent no.3 has no objection to the same.

8. On finding that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of vehicle no.DL-1LK-7011 which resulted in fatal injuries to the deceased Nawab @ Nabi Baksh, the Claims Tribunal in the absence of any evidence with regard to the deceased’s income took the minimum wages of an unskilled worker as Rs.7,722/- per month, made addition of 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards personal and living expenses and applied the multiplier of 13 to determine the loss of dependency.

9. The compensa





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top