Deepa Sharma, J.

1. Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the selection of respondent No.4 to the post of Vice-Principal.

2. The admitted facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as TGT (English) on 30.07.1983 and on 18.03.1991, she was appointed as PGT (English) on the basis of an interview by the Departmental Promotional Committee (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DPC’). Respondent No.4 was also working as PGT and was senior to 9 months to the petitioner. For the post of Vice-Principal, the applications/consents from all the PGT teachers were called for 20.10.2013. The petitioner applied for the said post on 31.10.2013. Besides respondent No.4, seven other PGTs applied for the post of Vice-Principal. All of them were called for an interaction with the DPC on 11.11.2013 and accordingly they all had appeared before the DPC.

3. The contention of the petitioner is that on 26.11.2013, the respondent had verbally announced in the school that respondent No. 4 had been selected for the Vice-Principal post. The said selection of respondent No.4