NAVIN CHAWLA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
GARG ASSOCIATES – Respondent
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 17th April, 2015 and the Arbitral Award dated 19th May, 2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator awarding certain claims in favour of the respondent.
2. At the outset, it is noted that the order dated 17th April, 2015 was merely an order passed in the course of the arbitration proceedings and is not an Arbitral Award in terms of Section 31 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). However, the said order, as would be evident from the discussion below, is intrinsically linked with the Impugned Arbitral Award dated 19th May, 2015 as the award, to a large extent is based on this order and so is equally the challenge thereto by the petitioner.
3. The brief factual background leading up to the Impugned Arbitral Award is noted as under:-
4. The petitioner had issued a Letter of Acceptance dated 26th July, 2008 awarding the tender for the work of modernization of Sena Bhawan, New Delhi to the respondent. The stipulated date for completion of the work was 6t
Associate Builders vs. DDA (2015) 3 SCC 49
Dwarka Das vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt.Ltd
P.C. Sharma v. Delhi Development Authority
Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Commission
Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India – 2007 (3) ARBLR 394 (Delhi)”
Venture Global Engineering vs. Satyam Computer Services Ltd & Anr. (2010) 8 SCC 660
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.