RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Aditya Prasad Dube – Appellant
Versus
Shobha Dube – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. Both these proceedings have been listed together and are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. C.R.P. 54/2015 under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC for short) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 15th November, 2014 in Civil Suit No.160/2014 of the Court of Additional District Judge-04, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi] for recovery of possession of the portion shown in red colour in the site plan Ex.PW1/1 proved therein, of property No.28, Central Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi, in the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 filed by Sharad Dube against (i) Aditya Prasad Dube, (ii) Vimmi Dube, (iii) Tarun Dube, (iv) Sonali Dube, and (v) M.C. Gupta. The defendants in the Suit were also restrained by a decree for permanent injunction from locking the common front main gate and common front varandah door of the property and from creating third party rights in the red portion aforesaid. However, since the property then was in possession of a Receiver appointed by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.