SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 625

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
State – Appellant
Versus
Mohd Faizan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ravi Nayak, Adv., P.K. Saxena, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.

1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13.03.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court in Session Case No. 44614/15, whereby all the respondents (accused before the Trial Court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 307/344/365/366/376/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as ‘IPC’).

2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, are as under: -

“(i) That DD No. 35-A was registered on receiving a Call from the control room at Police Station Khajuri Khas, on 04.02.2009 at about 12.10 am, in receipt of the information that 2-3 persons have forcibly kidnapped one minor girl and the brother of the minor girl has been given knife blows by the delinquent accused persons. The said DD was marked to SI Kunwar Pal Singh, and accordingly he was informed that the injured has been already taken to Bara Hindu Rao Hospital, subsequent to which SI Kunwar Pal Singh along with Constable (Ct.) Brijpal departed for Bara Hindu Rao Hospital and on their arrival, the injured


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top