SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Del) 889

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Kamal Goods Carrier (Regd. ) – Appellant
Versus
MCD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. V.K. Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mukesh Gupta with Ms. Shuchismita, Advocates for the MCD.

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

1. The writ petition impugns the challaning of the petitioner and upon non-payment of the challan amount, the consequent proceedings initiated against the petitioner under Sections 357 & 397 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) Act, 1957 before the Special Metropolitan Magistrate. Notice of the writ petition was issued and vide interim order, coercive steps against the petitioner stayed.

2. While Section 357 supra inter alia prohibits owner/occupier of any premises from throwing / depositing rubbish upon any street, Section 397 supra inter alia prohibits deposit of material of any description in any public street. The petitioner was challaned with respect to the street outside its premises in Transport Centre at Punjabi Bagh, Rohtak Road, developed by the respondent No. 3 DDA.

3. The challenge to the challan / proceedings is made on the ground that the respondent No. 3 DDA having not handed over the operation of the said Transport Centre to the respondent No. 1 MCD, MCD is not entitled to challan or initiate the aforesaid proceedings.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent No. 2, being an official of the MCD has challaned / initiated the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top