PRATEEK JALAN
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Amit Choudhary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 19.11.2018 passed by the Additional District Judge-09 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in CS No. 1202/2017. By the said order, the Trial Court dismissed the application of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XVIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “the CPC”), seeking a direction upon the defendants to lead their evidence first.
Facts
2. The plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants for recovery of a sum of Rs.30,40,000/- alongwith interest thereupon. The plaintiff's case is that the defendants entered into a Collaboration Agreement dated 26.03.2014 with him for development and construction of a building on the suit property (property measuring 160 sq. yards, bearing property no. 11377-11378, Singhara Chowk, Nabi Karim, Idgah Road, Delhi). The plaintiff claims to have paid Rs.10,00,000/- out of the agreed consideration. The allegation of the plaintiff is that the defendants did not deliver possession of the suit property which was, in fact, sealed by municipal authorities. In addition to the refund of Rs.10,00,000/- claimed by hi
Balakrishna Kar vs. H. K. Mahatab
Bhagirath Shankar Somani v. Rameshchandra Daulal Soni
Chandramohan Ramchandra Patil and Ors. vs. Bapu Koyappa Patil (Dead) Through LRs and Ors.
Mahender Kr. Lamba vs. Satender Prakash Lamba
Manoj Gupta vs. Munna Lal Sadh
Metafield Coil Private Limited v. Nikivik Tube Industries Private Limited
Mohammad Jahangir vs. Sajda Khatoon
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable vs. Asstt. Charity Commr. (2004) 3 SCC 137
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.