Back
JYOTI SINGH
Rajiv Chopra – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional petition for quashing repatriation order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments detailing the petitioner's qualifications and alleged malafide removal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's recognition of the limits of osd appointment in terms of temporary nature. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. context of extension of osd appointments and requirements for removal. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 5. discussion on appointment criteria under ugc regulations. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. clarification on powers during the pandemic and electronic communication for approvals. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. focus on temporary appointment nature and relevant case law. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. delineation of rights concerning temporary and officiating appointments. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 9. law on temporary post tenure and reversion rights. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 10. evaluation of whether an order of reversion constitutes punishment. (Para 50 , 52 , 54) |
| 11. final observations on procedural propriety and treatment of educators. (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 12. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 70) |
| 13. conclusion on applications related to the main petition. (Para 72 , 73) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. - Present Petition has been filed under Article 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
