Back
MUKTA GUPTA
Dharamvir Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Asian Hotels (north) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summarization of the claims made by plaintiffs regarding licenses. (Para 1) |
| 2. defendant's assertion regarding arbitration and maintainability. (Para 2 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 30) |
| 3. nature of the licenses and rights conferred to plaintiffs. (Para 3 , 5 , 8 , 22 , 23 , 32 , 38 , 46) |
| 4. observations on the revocation of licenses by the defendant. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 27 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. determination of arbitrability of the dispute. (Para 52 , 56 , 58 , 68 , 74 , 78) |
| 6. conclusion on the claims and the court's decision. (Para 92 , 93) |
JUDGMENT
Mukta Gupta, J. - The six suits before this Court seek similar reliefs based on similar licences. The prayers in the six suits by the plaintiffs are that they are licencees of the defendant in respect of shops at the shopping arcade in Hyatt Hotel, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi and the terms of the licences, inter alia, were akin to an irrevocable licence in perpetuity in the said shop and thus the termination of their licences by the defendant vide termination notices dated 29th May, 2020 is illegal. Consequently, the plaintiffs in the four suits i.e. CS(COMM) Nos.189, 190 191 and 192 of 2020 inter alia seek a decree of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
