Back
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Beoworld Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bang & Olufsen Expansion – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the application filed (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts of the case and background (Para 4) |
| 3. non-compliance with court orders (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments from both parties (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's analysis of jurisdiction clause (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. court's reasoning and final observations (Para 15) |
| 7. final conclusion and order (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Shakdher, J. - This is an application filed by the defendant under the provisions of Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [in short "CPC"].
2. For the ease of narration, the plaintiff and the defendant will be collectively referred to as parties unless the context requires otherwise.
3. The captioned application is pivoted on a singular clause i.e. Clause 18 of the Master Dealer Agreement dated 19.03.2014 [in short "MDA"].
3.1 Based on this clause [in particular, Clauses 18.1 and 18.2], the defendant asserts that the disputes raised in the instant suit can be presented by the plaintiff only before the Court where the defendant is located i.e. The Danish Court.
3.2 The plaintiff disputes this contention. The plaintiff claims that this Court has concurrent jurisdiction. In thi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
