SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 69

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JAYANT NATH, J.
Naharpur Yuva Shakti RWA - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 11775 of 2019
Decided on : 16-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Anand Yadav, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr.Avinash Singh, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-1. Ms.Nidhi Raman, Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Advs. for DDA. Mr.Prashant Mehta, Adv.

Point of Law: Dela laches - Development plan - Bidders who have made payments should not be made to suffer on account of the belated approach of the petitioner in writ petition

Headnote:

DDA Act - Section 22(3) - Delhi Land Reforms Act - Section 150 - Development Plan and Development Layout Plan of urban Village - Acquisition of land - Interim order - Seeking direction Respondents particular DDA to prepare Development Plan and Development Layout Plan of urban Village considering physical, social and cultural milieu of urban Village and particularly provided playgrounds, open spaces, parks, proper phirni and circular roads and other amenities on acquired land considering ground realities and future needs of urban Village and provide said facilities particularly in portion of Pocket E-2 and E-1, Sector-7 which area from three side suit surrounded urban village and one side by sector road dividing Sector 7 and Sector 3 of Rohini or in alternative.

Finding of the court: Interim order of this court has to be vacated to permit DDA to complete the auction that was held - There is a strong plea raised by DDA that plots in questions are residential in terms of Layout Plan. There is no denial of this proposition or challenge to the Layout Plan or to the Zonal Development Plan raised in present petition - Clearly the plots are stated as residential plots in Layout Plan/applicable plans - There is much delay and laches on the part of the petitioner in filing this petition. The land in question of Village was acquired in 1979. In 1982 the area was declared as an urban village under Section 507 of the MCD Act. Much reliance is also placed on an order of a Coordinate Bench of this court passed in 1993 directing certain facilities to be provided. The Layout Plan was passed in 2005 - However, no doubt plea of petitioner for additional facilities in area needs a closer look. However, that issue can be looked into and adjudicated upon in writ petition - Further, examination of pleas of petitioner does not warrant or require continuation of the interim order -

Result: CM filed by petitioner is dismissed and CM filed by DDA is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

JAYANT NATH, J.

CM APPLs. Nos. 48351/2019 (for interim relief filed by the petitioner) 18505/2020 (u/S 151 CPC filed by DDA)

1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-

    “(a) directing the Respondents particular DDA to prepare the Development Plan and Development Layout Plan of urban Village Naharpur, Delhi considering the physical, social and cultural milieu of urban Village Naharpur and particularly provided playgrounds, open spaces, parks, proper phirni and circular roads and other amenities on the acquired land considering the ground realities and the future needs of the urban Village Naharpur, Delhi and provide said facilities particularly in portion of Pocket E-2 and E-1, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi which area from three side suit surrounded urban village Naharpur and one side by sector road dividing Sector 7 and Sector 3 of Rohini or in alternative;

(b) direct the Respondent No.1 to issue directions to the DDA under section 22(3) of DDA Act or any other provision to prepare Development Plan and Development Layout Plan and also to provide playground, open spaces, parks in portions of Pocket E-2 and E-1, Sector7, Rohini, Delhi on the acquired land and at least leave the utilize the land equivalent to common land of Village Nahaipur, Delhi, which was in the name of Gram Sabha Village Naharpur, Delhi and for which no compensation was paid and same was transferred to DDA and which is vested in Union of India so as to provide playground, parks, open space and other amenities in portion of Pocket E-2 and E-1, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi;

(c) Restrain the DDA from accepting the auction money of the No.30 to Plot No.51 of Pocket E-2, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi and Plot No. 100 to Plot No.115 of Pocket E-1, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi and the area shown in Green colour in Armexure-P9 and not to confirm the said auction and not to handover possession of said plots and not to permit to cut down the trees standing on the said land or raise any construction on the land of portions of Pocket E-2 and E-1, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi.

(d) Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to hold enquiry and take action against the officials of DDA, who have failed to discharge their statutory duties to prepare the Development Plan and Development Layout Plan of urban villages particularly urban Village Naharpur, Delhi after DDA has received Urban Village Cess, prepared the project reports on urban villages and also receiving the grant during 7th Five Year Plan for providing various facilities including open spaces, playgrounds, parks and other amenities or under any other plan or project.”

2. On 08.11.2019, this court in the stay application CM No.48351/2019 passed the following order:-

    “1. Mr.Relan informs me that the notice for e-auction was issued on 09.03.2019 and the last date for submission of bids along with EMD was 21.04.2019. The online bidding, according to Mr. Relan, was conducted on 24.04.2019.

2. In sum, Mr Relan says that e-auction stands concluded.

3. There is, however, no clarity as to whether any of the bids received have been confirmed.

4. Therefore, status quo as of today will be maintained till the next date of hearing.

5. Renotify the matter on 28.11.2019.

6. In the meanwhile, the respondents will file an affidavit in the matter. The affidavit will be filed within one week. Rejoinder thereto, will be filed before the next date of hearing.”

3. The said interim order continues to be in operation. The respondent DDA has filed CM No. 18505/2020 for vacation of the interim order dated 08.11.2019.

4. As per the writ petition, the said Village Naharpur is well known for participation of its youths in games, particularly in Volleyball. After acquisition, the said Village Naharpur became a part of Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi and is surrounded by Pocket E-1 to E-4. There is a playground in the Village Naharpur, which is now part of Pocket E-2, Sector-7, Rohini Delhi. This area, it is said, was used as a playground by Village Naharpur and is also the l

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top